CALL US: (925) 660-7544
Request a free consultation

The Limited Effectiveness of “No Contest” Clauses in California Trust & Estate Litigation

June 12, 2017

A “no contest clause,” according to California Probate Code section 21310(c), is “a provision in an otherwise valid instrument that, if enforced, would penalize a beneficiary for filing a pleading in any court.” Stated simply, a no contest clause prohibits a beneficiary from receiving a gift under a will or trust that they would otherwise receive had they not filed a “contest.” (The law—Probate Code sections 21310-21312—includes several types of direct contests, but the most common grounds for contesting (challenging) a will or trust are lack of capacity, undue influence, and fraud.

One of the biggest misconceptions in California trust litigation concerns the effectiveness of no contest clauses.  This article explains no contest clauses and their limited effectiveness in California trust and estate litigation.


A typical no contest clause says:

No-Contest Cause

If any beneficiary under this instrument, singularly or in combination with any other person or persons, directly or indirectly does any of the following acts, then the right of that person to take any interest given to him or her by this instrument shall be void, and any gift or other interest in the trust property to which the beneficiary would otherwise have been entitled shall pass as if he or she had predeceased the settler without issue.

(a) Without probable cause challenges the validity of this instrument on any of the following grounds:

(i) Forgery;

(ii) Lack of due execution;

(iii) Lack of capacity;

(iv) Menace, duress, fraud, or undue influence;

(v) Revocation pursuant to the terms of this instrument or applicable law;

(vi) Disqualification of a beneficiary who is a “disqualified person” as described in California Probate Code section 21350 or applicable successor statute.

(b) Files a pleading to challenge the transfer of property on the grounds that it was not the transferor’s property at the time of the transfer;

(c) Files a creditor’s claim or prosecutes any action against the trust for any debt alleged to be owed to the beneficiary-claimant.

If a will or trust contains such a clause, and a beneficiary does any of the things listed in (a)-(c), above, he will forfeit any gift he would otherwise receive under the terms of the will or trust. As an example, consider a trust that says John will receive one-third of his father’s trust property when his father dies. If John were to consider suing to invalidate the trust based on undue influence, it would seem that the co contest clause would be a powerful deterrent against John suing, because doing so would put his one-third inheritance at risk. In practice, this is often not the case.

First, a no contest clause does not prevent a beneficiary from suing. Clients often believe that a beneficiary cannot sue if the trust contains a no contest clause. This is a misconception. In fact, nothing an estate planning attorney includes in the terms of a trust can prevent a beneficiary like John from suing. The no contest clause says—in essence—that if a beneficiary files a certain limited type of lawsuit, and loses, and the judge finds that the lawsuit was not brought with “probable cause,” the beneficiary would forfeit his inheritance under the trust. This does not mean that the beneficiary cannot sue.

Second, a no contest clause only has a deterrent effect if the beneficiary considering a contest would receive a substantial gift if he doesn’t sue. If a no contest clause is enforced, the beneficiary loses his inheritance, which is the potential downside of a contest. If the potential contestant receives no inheritance under the trust, the clause has no deterrent effect. In John’s case, if he received nothing from his father’s trust, he has nothing to lose by filing a contest. A client who fears a contest from a particular beneficiary should consider making a substantial gift to that beneficiary. How large the gift should be to deter a contest depends on the size of the trust and the beneficiary’s financial circumstances. In our experience, $10,000-$20,000 gifts have little deterrent effect.

Third, no contest clauses have limited effect because they are only enforced after the contestant loses at trial. If the contestant wins, the trust and the no contest clause are typically deemed invalid. Likewise, if the case settles before trial, the no contest clause is never enforced. Because most civil cases in California settle without a trial, no contest clauses are rarely enforced. Even if the case goes to trial and the contestant loses, a no contest clause will only be enforced against a direct contest (e.g., contests based on undue influence, incapacity, fraud) brought without “probable cause.” Under Probate Code section 21311(b) “probable cause exists if, at the time of filing a contest, the facts known to the contestant would cause a reasonable person to believe that there is a reasonable likelihood that the requested relief will be granted after an opportunity for further investigation or discovery.” Even if the contestant loses, he may still receive his gift under the trust if the judge determines that a reasonable person would believe that the contest had a reasonable chance of success.

If you are facing a potential trust or will contest, please call us for a free consultation.

Leave a Reply

3 Comment threads
3 Thread replies
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
4 Comment authors
barrattorneysGilesClaudMargery Recent comment authors
newest oldest most voted
Notify of

What is a no contest clause in California?


According to the California probate Code section 21310(c), a “no contest clause” stops beneficiaries from claiming gifts or additional interests that do not belong to the beneficiary. They do this to prevent forgery, lack of capacity, or undue influence from affecting the wishes of the deceased. When someone does violate the no contest clause because of the reasons listed above, then they could lose their right to their inheritance. That said, a beneficiary can still sue the estate to claim additional benefits they believe due to them based on their interpretation of the will. No estate attorney can prevent people… Read more »


What are common California No Contest Clauses?


A standard “no content clause” includes language that prohibits any beneficiary from challenge Common no contest clauses in California usually prevents beneficiary making accusations that could alter the deceased’s intended desires for their monies. Often if you have more than one beneficiary, you see challenges in the will. It is the job of a no contest clause to help minimize any frivolous challenges or the beneficiary may lose all rights to their claim. Often in California, most cases never reach the courts. They are settled beforehand. Additionally, it is rare for a no contest clause to be used. Usually, the… Read more »


What does a sample no contest clause in California contain?

  • Any no contest clause is included in the traditional well. Normally, the no contest clause is a section of the will. The no contest clause contains the following provisions:
    • Forgery
    • Lack of due execution
    • Lack of capacity
    • Manace, duress, fraud, or undue influence
    • Revocation pursuant to the terms of the instrument or applicable law

    Related Stories

    October 10, 2018

    Probate Code 16004.5: Release of Trustee’s Liability

    The last steps in a trust administration include: Filing the final income tax return Obtaining an estate...
    November 2, 2017

    Electronic Wills: A Bad Idea From Across the Pond

    Proposed Inheritance Law Update We are big fans of our brothers across the Atlantic—the pint,...
    December 14, 2016

    Probate Code 15305: Support Creditor’s Claim Against a Spendthrift Trust

    Many California living trusts contain a “spendthrift clause”— a clause designed to protect trust assets...